Search for: "California Public Utilities Commission et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
California Public Utilities Commission, several small, rural, privately-owned telephone companies asked the California court of appeals to review a decision of the California Public Utilities Commission (“PUC”).[1] The PUC’s ruling related to the companies’ cost of capital, “a measurement of the cost of obtaining debt and equity financing, and it reflects the amount investors would… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
California Public Utilities Commission, several small, rural, privately-owned telephone companies asked the California court of appeals to review a decision of the California Public Utilities Commission (“PUC”).[1] The PUC’s ruling related to the companies’ cost of capital, “a measurement of the cost of obtaining debt and equity financing, and it reflects the amount investors would… [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:49 pm
Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:49 pm
Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531). [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 11:11 am
Last month, the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District of California issued a decision in Pico Neighborhood Association, et al v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:00 pm
The Court of Appeal's decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp., et al. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
ADB Utility Contractors, Inc. (14-CA-27386, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 53) St. [read post]
25 May 2019, 11:00 am
(David et al. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm
City and County of San Francisco, et al. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
Supreme Court held that it would violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment for Colorado to force a website designer to create a wedding website for a same-sex couple, because it would compel her to create speech in which she did not believe (303 Creative LLC, et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Maine Public Utilities Commission, et al. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:00 am
(Kendall et. al., Wall Street Journal). [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
We conclude that there is no legal basis to doubt the Commission’s authority to mandate public-company disclosures related to climate. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
City of Newport Beach (Newport Banning Ranch LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2017) ___ Cal.5th ___. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:28 pm
After over two years of processing, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and adopted the proposed tentative map and mitigated negative declaration (“MND”). [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:24 pm
On March 4, 2019, in National Women’s Law Center, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.… [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
Christopher Anderson, et al. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 3:50 pm
Penn State Hershey Medical Center et al. at 5. [4] Id. at 13. [5] Id. at 7. [6] Id. at 9. [7] Id. [8] Id. [9] Id. at 10. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of California, et al. [read post]
